It slashed its forecasts for economic growth both in the US and predicted that global economic growth would slow to 2.8% this year.
Today the Fund has resurfaced with a markedly different message. It upgraded growth in both the US and elsewhere. Global economic growth this year will actually be 3.2%, it added. So, has the Fund conceded victory to Donald Trump? Is it no longer fretting about the economic impact of tariffs?
Money latest: Shock over retirement age
Either way, the World Economic Outlook (WEO), the IMF’s six-monthly analysis of economic trends, is well worth a look. This document is perhaps the ultimate synthesis of what economists are feeling about the state of the world, so there’s plenty of insights in there, both about the US, about far-reaching trends like artificial intelligence, about smaller economies like the UK and plenty else besides. Here, then, are four things you need to know from today’s WEO.
The tariff impact is much smaller than expected… so far
The key bit there is the final two words. The Fund upgraded US and global growth, saying: “The global economy has shown resilience to the trade policy shocks”, but added: “The unexpected resilience in activity and muted inflation response reflect – in addition to the fact that the tariff shock has turned out to be smaller than originally announced – a range of factors that provide temporary relief, rather than underlying strength in economic fundamentals.”
In short, the Fund still thinks those things it was worried about six months ago – higher inflation, lower trade flows and weaker income growth – will still kick in. It just now thinks it might take longer than expected.
The UK faces the highest inflation in the industrialised world
One of the standard exercises each time one of these reports come out is for the Treasury to pick out a flattering statistic they can then go back home and talk about for the following months. This time around the thing they will most likely focus on is that Britain is forecast to have one of the strongest economic growth rates in the G7 (second only to the US) this year, and the third strongest next year.
But there are a couple of less flattering prisms through which one can look at the UK economy. First, if you look not at gross domestic product but (as you really ought to) at GDP per head (which adjusts for the growing population), in fact UK growth next year is poised to be the weakest in the G7 (at just 0.5 per cent).
Second, and perhaps more worryingly, UK inflation remains stubbornly high in comparison to most other economies, the highest in the G7 both this year and next. Why is Britain such an outlier? This is a question both Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey will have to explain while in Washington this week for the Fund’s annual meeting.
What happens if the Artificial Intelligence bubble bursts?
Few, even inside the world of AI, doubt that the extraordinary ramp up in tech share prices in recent months has some of the traits of a financial bubble. But what happens if that bubble goes pop? The Fund has the following, somewhat scary, passage:
“Excessively optimistic growth expectations about AI could be revised in light of incoming data from early adopters and could trigger a market correction. Elevated valuations in tech and AI-linked sectors have been fuelled by expectations of transformative productivity gains. If these gains fail to materialize, the resulting earnings disappointment could lead to a reassessment of the sustainability of AI-driven valuations and a drop in tech stock prices, with systemic implications.
“A potential bust of the AI boom could rival the dot-com crash of 2000 in severity, especially considering the dominance of a few tech firms in market indices and involvement of less-regulated private credit loans funding much of the industry’s expansion. Such a correction could erode household wealth and dampen consumption.”
Pay attention to what’s happening in less developed countries
For many years, one of the main focuses at each IMF meeting was about the state of finances in many of the world’s poorest nations.
Rich countries lined up in Washington with generous policies to provide donations and trim developing world debt. But since the financial crisis, rich world attention has turned inwards – for understandable reasons. One of the upshots of this is that the amount of aid going to poor countries has fallen, year by year. At the same time, the amount these countries are having to pay in their annual debt interest has been creeping up (as have global interest rates). The upshot is something rather disturbing. For the first time in a generation, poor countries’ debt interest payments are now higher than their aid receipts.
I’m not sure what this spells. But what we do know is that when poor countries in the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa face financial problems, they often face instability. And when they face instability, that often has knock on consequences for everyone else. All of which is to say, this is something to watch, with concern.
The IMF’s report is strictly speaking the starting gun for a week of meetings in Washington. So there’ll be more to come in the next few days, as finance ministers from around the world meet to discuss the state of the global economy.
